Interested in a PLAGIARISM-FREE paper based on these particular instructions?...with 100% confidentiality?

Order Now

Assignment 2 Dropbox for review and critique. As this is a continuing project throughout this course, the grading criteria for this and all other project-related assignments may be found by clicking here. The Program Evaluation Proposal is due this week. It is the incorporation of all of the proposal activity assignments, from Module 1 through Module 6. The final paper is an integration of all those assignments into one presentation, which should be submitted at this time. This will give your instructor the time to provide needed feedback next week. The scoring rubric is attached to this assignment. By Wednesday, June 25, 2014, post your project proposal in the M7: Assignment 2 Dropbox for review and critique. Every week, your assignment should be submitted using proper APA format. A cover page will not be required. However, the first page of the assignment should include a title and proper headings for sections of your response. In-text citations should follow APA guidelines, and you should include a Reference list as a separate page with entries that match in-text citations. You may include an Appendix if you have additional information (e.g., assessment instruments, tables/figures, other supporting documentation). All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources. Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points Presented a logical and justified description of how you would analyze your observations for each indicator. 6 Presented written summaries of data in formats which are consistent with the questions/hypotheses of the evaluation. 4 Consistent with the level of measurement and the data analyses used for the indicator. 4 Appropriate to the stakeholder audience. 4 Described and justified various strategies for providing other methods and formats of feedback to various stakeholder groups which can facilitate utilization of the feedback. 6 Referenced appropriate supportive documentation. 2 Utilized correct APA format for headings, margins, spacing, citations, etc. 2 Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. 4 Total: 32

Assignment 2 Dropbox for review and critique. As this is a continuing project throughout this course, the grading criteria for this and all other project-related assignments may be found by clicking here.
The Program Evaluation Proposal is due this week. It is the incorporation of all of the proposal activity assignments, from Module 1 through Module 6. The final paper is an integration of all those assignments into one presentation, which should be submitted at this time. This will give your instructor the time to provide needed feedback next week. The scoring rubric is attached to this assignment.
By Wednesday, June 25, 2014, post your project proposal in the M7: Assignment 2 Dropbox for review and critique.
Every week, your assignment should be submitted using proper APA format. A cover page will not be required. However, the first page of the assignment should include a title and proper headings for sections of your response. In-text citations should follow APA guidelines, and you should include a Reference list as a separate page with entries that match in-text citations. You may include an Appendix if you have additional information (e.g., assessment instruments, tables/figures, other supporting documentation).
All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points
Presented a logical and justified description of how you would analyze your observations for each indicator. 6
Presented written summaries of data in formats which are consistent with the questions/hypotheses of the evaluation. 4
Consistent with the level of measurement and the data analyses used for the indicator. 4
Appropriate to the stakeholder audience. 4
Described and justified various strategies for providing other methods and formats of feedback to various stakeholder groups which can facilitate utilization of the feedback. 6
Referenced appropriate supportive documentation. 2
Utilized correct APA format for headings, margins, spacing, citations, etc. 2
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. 4
Total: 32

Interested in a PLAGIARISM-FREE paper based on these particular instructions?...with 100% confidentiality?

Order Now